Suspicion usually is cast on hit-and-run auto accidents. This is particularly true when the plaintiff is a professional litigant with a clear pattern of prior accidents involving a nearly identical set of circumstances. Such was the case of a recent Michigan plaintiff who was seeking uninsured motorist benefits. In November 2013, the plaintiff alleged that, while he and his front- and back-seat passengers were traveling 30 to 40 miles per hour on Westbound I-94, his Lincoln MKZ was struck in a hit-and-run by a truck.
Read Full Article