Court Decision On “Surface Water” In The Policy Exclusion, But Not In The Flood Endorsement (Canadian Underwriter)

Court Decision On “Surface Water” In The Policy Exclusion, But Not In The Flood Endorsement

  Monday, August 3rd, 2020 Source: Canadian Underwriter

The Co-operators has to pay a Mississauga banquet hall facility nearly $1 million – about double the amount it originally paid on a sewer backup policy – for losses arising from an historic 2013 rain storm, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled.

In a decision released July 28, the court overturned a 2019 Superior Court of Justice finding that Le Treport Wedding & Convention Centre Ltd. is only covered for sewer backup and does not also have coverage under a flood endorsement on its commercial policy.

The language “surface water” appears in The Co-operators’ policy exclusion for flood coverage, the court observed, but it does not appear in the flood endorsement on the policy. In the endorsement, a flood is defined as “the rising of, the breaking out or the overflow of any body of water, whether natural or man-made and includes waves, tides, tidal waves and tsunamis.” The discrepancy in the language used to define a “flood” featured prominently is the debate about whether The Co-operators’ flood endorsement applied in addition to the $500,000 policy limit it paid for sewer back-up.

Le Treport was one of many Greater Toronto Area (GTA) properties affected by a huge rainstorm early in the evening July 8, 2013. The western GTA got about 90 mm of rain in an hour, costing the industry about $1 billion in insured damage.

  Read Full Article
SOS Ladder AssistMid-America Catastrophe ServicesWeller SalvageHancock Claims Consultants LLC

  Recent Provider Listings

Serving Utah Statewide
Utah Attorneys & Law Firms
Serving Kansas, Missouri & Oklahoma Statewide
Kansas Missouri Oklahoma Fire Investigations
Serving Nevada Statewide - CLM Member
Nevada Attorneys & Law Firms