Malicious Prosecution Claims: Trend Or Anomaly?

 Friday, September 18, 2020

 CLM Magazine

For years, courts have generally viewed the appropriate trigger of coverage for malicious prosecution claims as a binary choice: either the coverage trigger date for the malicious prosecution claim is the date when the wrongful prosecution against the claimant began, or it’s the date when the accused’s innocence is vindicated in a court of law.

Unsatisfied with this dichotomy, policyholders have sometimes argued that all policies in effect from the time the claimant was wrongfully arrested until the date of exoneration are obligated to provide coverage.

Until recently, courts had consistently rejected this approach, finding that the claim takes place at a distinct point in time.

However, in the past year, decisions by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying Kentucky law [St. Paul Guardian Ins. Co. v. City of Newport, KY, 19-5948, 2020 WL 1514837 (6th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020], and the Missouri Court of Appeals [Ferguson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., WD 82090, 2019 WL 6703892 (Mo. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2019)] have revived what looked to be a dead argument.

Although these two appellate decisions are unpublished, they could mark the beginning of a new trend in this area of coverage law.
Litigation
BROWSE RELATED NEWS ARTICLES

5 Claims Tech Trends To Watch In The 2020s

 Tuesday, March 3, 2020

 Digital Insurance

Claims Costs In Auto Lines Trending Upward In Canada

 Thursday, May 31, 2018

 Canadian Underwriter

Top 10 Claims Trends That Will Affect 2018

 Thursday, February 15, 2018

 Insurance Thought Leadership

U.S. Homeowners Insurance Trends Show Claims Decreasing

 Tuesday, November 8, 2016

 Live Insurance News

Note 7 Owners File Class Action Suit

 Wednesday, October 19, 2016

 Digital Trends