Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer P.A.

Insurer Must Defend Salon for Violation of Biometric Information Privacy Act

 Wednesday, June 2, 2021

 The National Law Review

On May 20, 2021, the Supreme Court of Illinois upheld the state appellate decision finding that that West Bend Mutual Insurance Company must defend its insured, a tanning salon, against a class-action lawsuit claiming violation of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) under two business owners’ liability policies.

The plaintiff in the class action lawsuit purchased a membership from the tanning salon.

As part of the use of the salon’s services, the plaintiff was required to provide the salon with her fingerprints for use in the salon’s client registration system.

The tanning salon then provided that information to its third-party vendor for hosting.

Specifically, the plaintiff alleged: Krishna Tan systematically and automatically collected, used, stored, and disclosed their [customers’] biometric identifiers or biometric information without first obtaining the written release required by 740 ILCS 14/15(b)(3).

Home Insurer Has A Duty To Defend Road Rage Claim

 Thursday, August 13, 2020

 Canadian Underwriter

Preparing For COVID-19 Biometric Litigation

 Tuesday, July 21, 2020

 Risk Management

Biometrics On The Rise As Insurers Look For Smoother Experience

 Tuesday, August 1, 2017

 Digital Insurance

Hulu Sued By Insurance Company Over Privacy Violation Claims

 Friday, April 6, 2012

 The Hollywood Reporter