Work-Product Between Adjusters And In-House Counsel, Protected Or Not? (CLM Magazine)

Work-Product Between Adjusters And In-House Counsel, Protected Or Not?

  Monday, November 30th, 2020 Source: CLM Magazine

Communications and information exchanged between adjusters and insurer in-house counsel present unique challenges for application of the work-product protection, and the law is not uniform in this area.

Let’s explore the factors considered by courts when determining whether such communications and information are protected from disclosure to the insured and/or third-party claimant, and the typical disputes that arise in both coverage and bad-faith litigation.

Work-product protection applies to protect disclosure of an attorney’s mental impressions, and prevent discovery of materials prepared in anticipation of litigation or trial.

Most courts will require disclosure if the opposing party shows a substantial need for the material and an inability to obtain the substantial equivalent of the material by other means. Attorney involvement is generally not required.

Unlike attorney-client privilege, courts generally do not consider work-product protection “substantive” law. Accordingly, federal courts exercising diversity jurisdiction will apply federal law to determine whether information is protected work product, which can lead to disparities in treatment of information between federal and state courts in the same location.

  Read Full Article
SOS Ladder AssistMid-America Catastrophe ServicesBio Management NorthwestU.S. Forensic

  Recent Provider Listings

Serving the Northeast
Connecticut New Jersey New York Adjusters
Serving North Carolina, Northern South Carolina & Southern Virginia
North Carolina Adjusters Appraisers Heavy Equipment
Serving Los Angeles & Surrounding Counties
California Accident Investigations Accident Reconstruction Services