AI-edited claim photos and documents are no longer rare. They are appearing in everyday claims and changing how adjusters evaluate evidence.

The study finds that nearly all insurers have encountered manipulated media, with most reporting that submissions have become more sophisticated over the past year. Consumer use of AI editing tools is now widespread, and many users say their edits look realistic. For adjusters, this removes a long-standing assumption. Visual documentation can no longer be accepted at face value, even in routine claims.

The report also highlights a growing gray area in claimant behavior. While most consumers say fraud is unacceptable, a significant portion admit they would consider making small edits to strengthen a claim. These changes may be framed as clarifying damage, but they can still influence claim outcomes. For adjusters, this creates added pressure to distinguish between acceptable documentation and material misrepresentation.

Detection capabilities remain uneven. Insurers report higher confidence in identifying basic photo edits, but far less confidence in detecting deepfakes. This gap becomes more significant in complex or high-value claims, where manipulated media may be harder to identify. Adjusters are increasingly relying on a mix of automated tools, manual review, and escalation to SIU when inconsistencies appear.

Operational challenges are also growing. The study points to limited integration between fraud detection tools and claims systems, along with concerns about false positives and missed fraud. These issues can slow claim handling and increase friction when legitimate claims are flagged for additional review. At the same time, carriers are expanding training and issuing new guidance, reinforcing the need for adjusters to understand how AI-driven fraud presents in real claim files.

Looking ahead, insurers expect stricter documentation requirements, longer claim cycles, and increased scrutiny across the claims process. The study also notes expectations of higher SIU workloads and more frequent disputes. For adjusters, this means more detailed file documentation, stronger verification practices, and closer coordination with fraud teams as digital fraud continues to evolve.